понеделник, 17 юни 2019 г.

Think About It

By DeYtH Banger

Always being a slave, being a slave in somebody else hands. Spreading around their opinion, and you believing in their opinion.

The irony of life out of comedy is that we hqve whole bunch of different type if soups in which we believe we have massive shit to do… want to do… must do and so on and so on. Tge moral lesson is stop for a minute, have caugh progress… have you forggotten about having fun?

Go out… relax… have fun, enjoy life..  you have never been suppossed to take life seriously. As for me, I was saying my opinion, I don't want you to force believe in this shit… just do whatever you want… if you reading AIN'T an excuse to not to go out… just fucking go out… stop with the fucking excuses. Life is not ment to be created for thy men with excuses.

I had time, I gave thought about certain stuff in life… certain stuff… which I was.… which I had… after all one those stuff is not christian…. I am deeply core atheist, like it… hate it?
Doesn't matter!

Think about it… is the big question we want to believe in higher mission and bigger picture just to feel good… TO THINK THAT WE MATTER


IT'S NOT COMEDY… I WON'T THROW JOKES… I AM GOING TO THROW THINKING MATERIAL… SHIT TO THINK ABOUT. Don't shame, blame yourself just think about the opportunities which you decided to skip… to miss just because  you had a fucking reason to be a wossie… probably fucked up as child… probably bad life… think about it… this here is comefy + creepypasta made into lesson… fun read… ready to question.

And after all well structured answers… questions… doesn't make in life clarity… after all data is deep shit… the more raw you go deep the less meaning you find….

GOD DOESN'T EXIST

What now? What should I do?
I don't fucking know.… even to exist he is not making any changes… praying doesn't bring job… health or even rather moment of food…
So why in fucking hell to waste my time to someone… who doesn't answers my messages?

Think about i!

Probably everyday we wake up we do the same thing… over and over and over and over with main subtle wish… "Make me think that I did different stuff"…"Make me think that my life is making impact".

The fucks at the bar who are giving less value and always… eat… piss… shit… get money and waste their life with less goals… and less targets… or even if they have they are not vivid… SUCH FUCKS

Are not contributing to "meaning" in life…
The dreams are reality… when you dream you sometimes just don't know… as for… are you awake or you are dreaming.

Comedy: Nervous

By DeYtH Banger

I went there and she closed the phone… and she started staring at me… like I am GOD

That's what happens nowadays… HOW DID I PULL OF THIS SECRET?

It's magic!

I was a nervous kid… a kiddo with deep inside problems… but my life has been improved… HOW?

How about to skip this topic… BECAUSE I AM NOT ON THE MARKET

Look what I hate about women…, listen carefully… I AIN'T GONNA REPEAT… REPEATION THROWS ME OUT OF THE WINDOW…

THERE ARE EASY GIRLS… WHICH ARE DEFIBETLY EASY TO KISS… TO FUCK AND TGERE ARE GIRLS WHICH NEED LITTLE VALIDATION… LITTLE COMPLIMENT AND YOU LOST IT
YOU DEFIBETLY LOST THE WAR…

HER ENERGY IS FULL ON
SHE IS READY
VALIDATED

SHE DIESN'T NEED YOU

SO I GOT MY STRATEGIES… METHODS
WHEN I TALK TO GIRLS… I CRITICIZE THEM…
IT'S A GOOD ONE… IT'S A FUCKING GOOD ONE!

Girls get judged… girls don't fuck from self-pity… they can add you in friends… write you down few replies… but it's from pity… uf she is not back… as my most cases… the problem is that you are just too fucking traumatic…

FUCK ALL PRIVILLIGED FUCKERS

I just get awful inside chills when a girl says "bro.."
…. Use this fucking word… YOU GIRLS DON'T YOU GET IT… I AIN'T FUCKING… KISSING MY BROTHER… I AIN'T HOMO… YOU GOT IT WRONG… I AM STRAIGHT AS FUCK.
Insects are holy grails of shit… they are dumb… WHY GOD CREATED ONE OF THOSE FUCKS?

Keep in mind some shit, will ya?
If a girl has accepted your request… it means she is feels pitty about you… she is doing it because of self-pity… we won't go to psychological disorders… further termonology…

JUST KEEP IT SIMPLE
JUST FUCKING KEEP IT SIMPLE
PLAIN AND EASY


Look at yourself… already ready to sell yourself to be somebody slave… already ready to sell your mom… dad… family… ready to sell your apartment… house… ready to get into debt and definetly it's not it's advertisement … some sort of of "Stress Test" book… It's mind rape!


Manipulation - Is okay?
That's what my friends say

Girls are ready to manipulate people as far as to get to the result… the problem with girls… I MEAN I HAVE LEARN IT THE HARD WAY THIS SHIT SELF-ESTEEM ISSUES… CONFIDENCE… TRAUMA…

THE TRUTH IS THAT IF TAKEN GIRLS SERIOUSLY YOU PUT THEM ON PEDESTAL ONES THAT HAPPEN… IT DOESN'T MATTER THEN… YOU FUCKED UP… I MEAN YOU ALREADY DID A FAILURE


If you need a list for killing yourself… here it is… before you kill yourself… make sure to write this shit down.

"I am killing myself because of boredoom. I would like to stay tune, focused into one category. Suicide is a decipline… exercise for the bidy… mind and also typical forward rejection of reality."

- You weren't honest
- You missed x1000 opportunities
- The problem is in you…

I hope I am right on this point… I FUCKING HOPE SO… BECAUSE… IF I AM WRONG…
OH JESUS
OH GOD

I AM GOING TO BURN IN HELL
DEFINETLY IN HELL
SO LET'S MOVE IN… SHALL WE?

Review: Pride and Prejudice and Zombies

Pride and Prejudice and Zombies Pride and Prejudice and Zombies by Seth Grahame-Smith
My rating: 3 of 5 stars



View all my reviews

събота, 15 юни 2019 г.

Bible Arguments 4

By DeYtH Banger


"Randal’s intention here is to argue for the existence of God from the supposed existence of objective aesthetic beauty.

    For me, this is simple. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. It has to be. There is no beauty in the world at all, just as there isn’t anything ugly either. There is no color or sound or taste or smell or pain in the world. All that exists is raw, uninterpreted stuff. There are objects having certain shapes, objects that are made up of certain particles reflected in the periodic table of elements, and objects that are made of molecules and atoms. There are also wavelengths originating from moving objects or particles emitting from them. So seeing is dependent on a beholder. Hearing is dependent on a hearer."

- John W. Loftus

"What we find beautiful is largely based on our biology and thus explained by evolution. Just consider what the various animals in the world may think is beautiful. Take dogs for instance. Their olfactory senses are extremely sensitive. I saw a program in which a bloodhound was given the scent of a particular man and subsequently found the seat where that man had sat among thousands of seats in a huge stadium. But guess what smells wonderful to these dogs? Butts. Smelly, stinky butts. They stick their noses in them—especially butts of other dogs. It must smell really good to them, beautiful that is, even though with their sense of smell it must be extremely bombshell-busting strong."

- John W. Loftus

"The Bible speaks often as if God doesn’t know the future (Gen. 22:12; Deut. 13:3; Jer. 3:7, 19–20; 26:3; 32:35; Ezek. 12:3; and Jon. 3:10). Why then should we think there is any reason he can…"

- John W. Loftus

"There are a few easily seen failed prophecies. Isaiah predicted the river Nile would dry up (Isa. 19:5–7). Isaiah predicted Damascus would cease to be a city (Isa. 17:1–2). Ezekiel predicted Nebuchadnezzar would destroy the city of Tyre (Ezek. 26:7–14) but later admitted this didn’t happen (Ezek. 29:17–20). Revising his original prediction, Ezekiel predicted instead that Egypt would become desolate and that Nebuchadnezzar would conquer it (Ezek. 29:8–12, 19–20). But that too never happened. Jeremiah predicted Jehoiakim, the king of Judah, would have no successor (Jer. 36:30) even though he was succeeded by Jehoiachin, his son (2 Kings 24:6). The prophets Haggai and Zechariah both predicted in their day that Zerubbabel was the long-awaited messiah (Hag. 2:20–23; Zech. 4:6:9–13; compare Zech. 6:9–15…"

- John W. Loftus

"Almost every scientific study done on prayer has shown that prayers are not statistically answered any better than luck.[72] Research has shown us that people are prone to misjudge the true probabilities for any given event—we’re often wrong. Take a deep breath right now. Mathematician John Allen Paulos asks us to consider the odds of whether we have just inhaled a molecule that came out of Caesar’s mouth when he said, “You too Brutus?” You’ll probably doubt this, but he shows that the odds of this happening stand at about 99 percent.[73]

    The fact is that incredible coincidences are common, even virtually certain, given enough opportunities for them to occur in the lives of millions of believers. The most we can say about them is that their causes are unknown. So once again Randal is arguing from the gaps—a…"

- John W. Loftus

"When it comes to miracles due to prayer, it gets worse. Believing in them demands a nearly impossible double burden of proof. What believers must show is that a miracle could not have happened within the natural world because it was nearly impossible (or else it’s not considered miraculous). Then they must turn right around and claim such an impossible event probably took place anyway. The probability that a miracle actually took place is inversely proportional to the probability that such an event could take place (i.e., the less probable it is that a miracle could take place, then the more probable it is that it didn’t take place), so the improbability of a miracle claim defeats any attempt to show it probably happened. That’s why extraordinary claims of miracles demand a greater amount of solid evidence for them (e.g., if a person tells us he levitated, we need more than just his testimony to believe him)…"

- John W. Loftus

"Believers have built in biases to accept miracles because they have a need to believe them. It basically shows us that people are still agency detectors—something we inherited from our animal ancestors. Since we know this about ourselves, it should cause us to be skeptical that there are agents behind unexplained events.

    That there are some unexplained events I’ll admit, just as there are some good things said in the Bible concerning women and animals. But the bad things must be explained and not just explained away.

    This raises the problem of suffering (or evil). There is no excuse for a good God not to do miracles for the millions of believers who suffer intensely around the world. For every personal claim of a miracle healing, there are perhaps hundreds of thousands of people who receive no such thing."

- John W. Loftus

"We do indeed have a design filter preprogrammed into us from our animal ancestors to see agents behind improbable events given the proper circumstances. We are also not good at predicting the actual probabilities of an improbable event. So we should not trust personal anecdotal evidence but instead trust the scientific studies on prayer."

- John W. Loftus

"We suffer from allergies, colds, migraines, Alzheimer’s disease, anemia, asthma, bronchitis, colitis, Crohn’s disease, epilepsy, gallstones, gastritis, glaucoma, gout, abnormal blood
pressure, kidney stones, chicken pox, small pox, polio, Parkinson’s disease, psoriasis, strokes, sudden infant death syndrome, thrombosis, tumors, typhoid fever, ulcers, Lou Gehrig’s disease, Lyme disease, malaria, rabies, rickets, Rocky Mountain spotted fever, tuberculosis, diphtheria, leprosy, measles, meningitis, mumps, pneumonia, rubella, syphilis, shingles, scoliosis, whooping cough, Down syndrome, hemophilia, Huntington’s disease, muscular dystrophy, sickle cell anemia, Tay-Sachs disease, AIDS, infertility, and so on. Major epidemics have decimated us, like the ones occurring in the years AD 542, 1331, 1556, and 1918. There are birth defects that include people born with two heads, with deformed limbs, blind, deaf, mute; and people born with mental deficiencies including dementia, bipolar disorder, and paranoid schizophrenia.

    There is much more I could add, but thinking people get the point. There isn’t an intelligent designer. Even if Randal still believes there is one anyway, this supernatural force (or being) is not a benevolent one, much less an omnibenevolent one. To argue that this is all Eve’s fault in Eden is scapegoating."

- John W. Loftus

"Randal is taking an irrational leap over the probabilities. A good, intelligent creator should show he cares for each individual on this planet. If he does not, we can reasonably conclude he either does not care or he does not exist at all.

    He’s punting to God’s omniscience as an answer—something other theists do to save their own omniscient God from refutation, making faith unfalsifiable. This proves once again that believers must be convinced their faith is nearly impossible before they will consider it improbable, which is an unreasonable standard. Even if God is omniscient and has higher ways than us, we still must know enough of his ways to know that he exists and that he cares for us—and if omniscient, he should know this about us."

- John W. Loftus

"First look at J. L. Schellenberg’s persuasive argument from divine hiddenness:

   
    1.  If there is a God, he is perfectly
loving.

    2.  If a perfectly loving God exists, reasonable nonbelief does not occur.

      3. Reasonable nonbelief occurs.

     4. No perfectly loving God exists (from 2 and 3).

    5.  Hence, there is no God (from 1 and 4).[83]
   

    If I have shown anything in this book, then I have a reasonable nonbelief. Therefore, unless someone can still maintain against the evidence that I don’t have a reasonable nonbelief, Schellenberg’s argument has been shown correct.

    Now consider Theodore Drange’s persuasive argument from unbelief for the existence of an evangelical God.

   
   1.   God wants all humans to believe before they die.

2. God can bring about that all, or almost all, humans believe before they die.

      3. God always acts in accordance with what he most wants.

    4.   If God exists, all or almost all humans would believe before they die (from 1).

     5.  But not all humans believe before they die.

      6. Therefore, God does not exist (from 2 and 3)"

- John W. Loftus

"The reason we sometimes act like brutes is because we evolved from them. There is therefore no need for atonement. It’s who we are, and it’s something that we alone can fix as morality evolves. The only reason Randal believes our rage (or sins) need atoning is because he was raised in a Western, Christianized culture. The vast majority of people in the world do not think someone like Jesus needs to be punished to death for the rest of us to be forgiven by a god."

- John W. Loftus

Bible Arguments 3

By DeYtH Banger


"This topic raises the issue of the goodness of the divine revelation in the Bible for a good, omnipotent, and omniscient God. It also raises the problem of suffering (or evil) if such a God exists. If any issue speaks against the goodness of the biblical conception of God, this is it.

    Former American slave Frederick Douglass described how his Christian master whipped his aunt right before his young eyes:

    He took her into the kitchen, and stripped her from neck to waist. He made her get upon the stool, and he tied her hands to a hook in the joist. After rolling up his sleeves, he commenced to lay on the heavy cowskin, and soon the warm, red blood came dripping to the floor. . . . No words, no tears, no prayers, from his gory victim, seemed to move his iron heart from its bloody purpose. The louder she screamed, the harder he whipped; and where the blood ran fastest, there he whipped longest. He would whip her to make her scream, and whip her to make her hush; and not until overcome by fatigue, would he cease to swing the blood clotted cowskin."

- John W. Loftus

"This simply cannot be true given evolution as a scientific fact. There are precursors of our own reasoning abilities found in animals. There is morality, consciousness, tool-making, learning, problem-solving, community, and communication.[24] At some point human beings could comprehend that an A(pple) is an A(pple) and not an O(range), so A=A and A≠O. They also comprehended something we must all do to stay alive.

   
    1.  If we want to stay alive then we must eat.

   2.   We want to stay alive.

    3.  Therefore we must eat."

- John W. Loftus


"The brains of dogs, donkeys, and dolphins work to help them survive. The brains of chimps, chicks, and chipmunks help them survive. The brains of pigs, porcupines, and platypuses help them survive. If their brains had not evolved as they did, then they wouldn’t have survived. Why then is it different with human beings."

- John W. Loftus

"The brains of dogs, donkeys, and dolphins work to help them survive. The brains of chimps, chicks, and chipmunks help them survive. The brains of pigs, porcupines, and platypuses help them survive. If their brains had not evolved as they did, then they wouldn’t have survived. Why then is it different with human beings."

- John W. Loftus

"Christians have their own difficulties when justifying reason. Nominalists, following William of Ockham (1288–1348), argue that God does not have a nature, and as such, he does not have the property (or attribute) of reason. They argue that a full-blown concept of God is one in which he created reason; otherwise where did it come from? The alternative that he must obey the dictates of reason implies that reason itself is independent of God; and if that’s the case, we don’t need God to justify reason. So whence comes reason on Christian grounds."

- John W. Loftus

"How does Randal propose we know something if it isn’t useful to us and discovered by trial and error? Surely he understands the difficulties with the correspondence and coherence theories of truth given that we don’t have access to the thing-in-itself, as Immanuel Kant successfully argued. We’re not talking in terms of ontology—about that which exists. Instead, we’re always talking in terms of epistemology, that is, how we can know it. Pragmatism works despite the fact that Randal doesn’t like the conclusion."

- John W. Loftus

"Adaptive beliefs are the ones that are useful for our survival. The rest of our beliefs, no matter how many of them we have, are either irrelevant to our survival or detrimental to it. I think religious beliefs are largely detrimental to our survival as a species in a world with weapons of mass destruction."

- John W. Loftus

"As I said earlier, a religion should be judged based on how it treats the defenseless. Women have largely been defenseless in a male-dominated society stemming in the West from what we
find in the Bible. Given the cruelty toward women that we see there and acted out in history, all civilized people should reject Christianity as nothing but a religion created in a barbaric, sexist era. While there are a few positive female role models and pro-women statements in the Bible, overall it is anti-women. These texts need to be explained, not explained away.

    A man was created first, not a woman, so Paul argued that men alone are created in the image of God (1 Cor. 11:3–9). The woman was merely created to be a man’s helper (Gen. 2:18–24). Women are considered the easily deceived weaker sex who can mislead men just as Eve misled Adam (1 Cor. 11:3; 1 Pet. 3:7). That’s why God said men will rule (or domineer) over them (Gen. 3:16). That’s why Paul told women to keep silent in his churches (1 Cor. 14:34–35; see also 1 Tim. 2:11
14). That’s also why women are to be subject to their husbands “in everything” (Eph. 5:24).

    In fact, as biblical scholar Michael Coogan argues, “Husbands and fathers had virtually absolute control over their wives and daughters.”[26] Sarah called her husband “lord” (Gen. 18:12) and “obeyed” him (1 Pet. 3:6; see vv. 1–6). These things reflect the status of a wife, writes Coogan, for “she was under her husband’s rule, she was his property."

- John W. Loftus

"The really horrific stuff is how Yahweh treated his unfaithful wife, Israel. Biblical scholar Susanne Scholz informs us, “God turns out to be a rapist.”[31] His wife is described as whoring after other lovers, so in return Yahweh sexually violates her and says she is to be blamed for her punishment. Biblical scholar J. Cheryl Exum translates Isaiah 3:17 like this: “The Lord will make bald the heads of the daughters of Zion, and the Lord will bare their cunts.”[32] In Jeremiah 13:22–26 Yahweh announces the rape of Jerusalem, and then he does this with “the obscene practice of exposing women by drawing their legs over their heads in order to uncover their vulvas completely.”[33]

    Yahweh punished his unfaithful wives like this, both Samaria and Jerusalem. (Yes, Yahweh was a polygamist!) The prophets Hosea (chapter 2), Jeremiah (chapter 13), and Ezekiel (chapters 16 and 23) tell us…"

- John W. Loftus

"They simply turn a deaf ear to the majority voices, something I call cherry-picking. Do Christians really think that a God who could threaten to kill off all the Israelites for disobedience could not have enforced a decent, civilized attitude toward women? Their delusion is probably never seen more than here."

- John W. Loftus

"While there are a few positive things said about animals in the Bible, over all it is uncaring and oblivious toward the pain and suffering we know that sentient animals experience. These texts need to be explained, not explained away.

    After creating the world, God declared it all “good.” Good for whom? Good for what purpose? To humans alone was given the right to “subdue” and have “dominion” over every living thing (Gen. 1:28 RSV). When we look at these Hebrew words, subdue literally means “to trample upon” (see Esther 7:8; Jer. 34:11; Zech. 9:15). The word dominion means to “master” over someone, especially when he or she refuses to be subdued (the same Hebrew word is used to describe ruling over slaves in 1 Kings 9:23 and Isa. 14:2)."

- John W. Loftus

"My claim is that we do not see much of a concern for animals in the Bible. It truly is anthropocentric to the core. And as such, it’s not indicative at all of what a perfectly good God would reveal to us. If God was truly concerned for the welfare of animals, he would have consistently said, “Thou shalt not mistreat or abuse animals.” Then Western Christianized people could not justify the ill treatment of them down through the centuries.

    God simply should not have created predation in the natural world; he should have made us all vegetarians or vegans. The amount of creaturely suffering in this world is atrocious as animals prey on one another to feed themselves, including humans feeding on animals."

- John W. Loftus

"There are some things I know without much doubt at all. The most certain thing I know is the cogito of René Descartes: “I think therefore I am.” Could I be wrong and not really exist? I doubt it. And as long as I doubt it there is someone doing the doubting—me. There are other things I know; for instance, I know I’m typing these words and drinking some coffee while I do. (Ahhh, that tasted good.) I have no reason at all to doubt my senses and the
personal experiences I’m presently having. They are incorrigible to me. Do I have faith that my coffee tastes good? No, I personally sense that it tastes good. There are other things I know without too much doubt—things too many to even list—and they are all based on solid empirical evidence along with good reasons for thinking them to be so. The more evidence and reasons there are for what I think is the case, then the more I can claim them to be the case.

    When it comes to faith, there are at least two ways to understand it. First, faith as hopeful, wishful thinking, motivates us to achieve great things. It helps us win the love and affection of a lover, a sports contest, or an important award. Sometimes we must maintain it in the face of all odds; otherwise we may quit trying. This kind of faith is like a self-fulfilling prophecy. But it cannot make something come true that doesn’t involve our actions."

- John W. Loftus

"There are some things I know without much doubt at all. The most certain thing I know is the cogito of René Descartes: “I think therefore I am.” Could I be wrong and not really exist? I doubt it. And as long as I doubt it there is someone doing the doubting—me. There are other things I know; for instance, I know I’m typing these words and drinking some coffee while I do. (Ahhh, that tasted good.) I have no reason at all to doubt my senses and the
Faith will not change these kind of facts. So when faith is used to make facts true that it cannot make true, I think faith is pretty much irrational. Wishful thinking about facts we cannot make true is not what thinking adults should do.

    Faith in the second sense is always a leap beyond the probabilities, for if something is highly probable then I don’t believe it to be true. I know it to be true by the degree of probability it has. We need to think exclusively in terms of probabilities and not try to add faith to them since faith doesn’t add anything at all. If we did this, all that would matter would be the probabilities. There would be no need for faith. Faith in this sense means someone is accepting an improbable conclusion."

- John W. Loftus

"Psychology professor James Alcock defines faith-based reasoning as “belief in search of data.” Full stop. Think about the implications of this and you’ll realize that we must cultivate doubt not faith. Doubt is, after all, the adult attitude.

    Evolutionary psychologist Jesse Bering calls belief “an instinct” in that “we have a cognitive bias to see intentions in inanimate objects.”[56] Pascal Boyer, professor of collective and individual memory, argues that we are “agency detectors” just like our animal predecessors who thought they saw agents, or predators, in the rustling leaves.[57] Agency detecting produced many more false alarms than actual threats to their lives, but because they had that instinct, they survived. Human beings also see agents in inanimate objects."

- John W. Loftus

"…concluded there were supernatural agent(s) above the clouds who were angry. They saw it in bumper crops and wives who gave birth to baby boys and concluded there were supernatural agent(s) who were pleased. Believers today still cannot bring themselves to think the universe was not created by a supernatural agent precisely because they still are agency detectors. This is the problem to overcome…"

- John W. Loftus

"We need only look to the alternative proposition that people are within their epistemic rights to believe without sufficient evidence in any other area. That’s a recipe for disaster, and Randal knows this."

- John W. Loftus

"…their particular trinitarian, incarnational, resurrection faith in the back door? Mormons and Muslims do the same thing…"

- John W. Loftus

"Given cognitive faculties that are functioning properly, our senses are more than adequate to draw reasonable. conclusions about our experiences. Look at the lengths Randal must go in order to slip his God through the cracks. No wonder I think he’s deluded. Faith is an irrational leap over the probabilitiesconclusions about our experiences. Look at the lengths Randal must go in order to slip his God through the cracks. No wonder I think he’s deluded. Faith is an irrational leap over the probabilities."

- John W. Loftus

Comedy: Hog

By DeYtH Banger


I hope I get raped… right now… Holy bundle of fuck… younger girls full of shit.. so much that few days with them… your life gets on the

FUCKING PEDESTAL…

JESUS CHRIST SUCKS… SO DOES GOD

IF I AM PERVERT SO DOES GOD
IF SON OF GOD IS GOD AND THE SPIRIT ALSO GOD HOWUCH PSYCHOLOGICAL MENTAL ILLNESSES DOES TGIS FUCK HAVE

DOES THIS FUCK HAVE SONE KINDA PERSONALITY DISORDER?


How is possible God to be one and and for each human being which we can spot God for him/her looks different…. IS GOD ONE OF THOSE PSYCHOLOGICAL NERV BREAK DOWNS IN WHICH GOD IS A WHOLE FULL PACKAGE OF DISEASE…


I MEAN I GET IT MACHOS GO GET TO BUILD MUSCLES… GO BUILD BODY AND GO ON FUCKING DIETS?


DO I CARE?
OF COURSE NOT
I DON'T CARE IF YOU KILL YOURSELF!
I DON'T CARE IF YOU GO VIRAL AND START KILLING PEOPLE?


BECAUSE I AM NOT THAT EASY IMPRESS… BY EACH MOVEMENT AND STUFF WHICH HAVE HAPPEN THE STAKES GET HIGHER AND HIGHER… SO DOES MY STANDARDS…


GOD?
SICKO
JESUS
FUCK THIS TORMENTED FUCK

I KNOW YOU GIRLS NEED TO BE NICE TO GUYS WHICH ARE NICE GUYS AND YOU DON'T WANT TO REJECT THEM THE RAW WAY…

BUT DON'T GIVE THEM FALSE HOPES… FALSE SIGNS
YOU ARE JUST PLAYING WITH THE DEVIL IN DETAILS…


WHAT'S TGE RAPIST TODAY DEFENDING ARGUMENT…


"The bitch… was begging for it…"

Think about… right now about animals… less ilness… less termology… less need to talking we don't have costumed dogs… who are the fucking law… dogs bark… bark… cats… (the same here… tgey make noises)… and tgeir life is more easier than a fully developed human….

Animals don't ask for permission
For example dog was fucking a woman… fully free packaged…. Developed female - We here can spot the psychological problems and disorders
Also a woman was sucking a horse dick… this shit can be seen on the animal porn sites… - Again same here… - Self-Loathing… self-esteem issues…
And the last example us a turtle fucking a slipper.


The moral of all story is when humans play on the edge… society got whole fucking bundle of disorders
….. cats… dogs can do that and after all anikals don't need to ask for permission the fuck the neighbor dog or cat or whatever the animal is..



WE ARE SPOTTING A WHOLE FREE WILL SHIT

Some people got it all wrong… with the whole tests which women give… BUT I AM HERE TO EXPLAIN THE WHOLE MATH PROBLEM


1) When you say "I am going to buy stuff…"
- This here applies that you are going to be the "provider"… if you buy stuff the only reason need to buy is to reward certain type of behavior… but again on specific rules and conditions

2) Do you "wanna go out with me?" Or "Will you go out with me?"

- This here sounds more likely… "Can I be a man in front of you?"… "Will you give me permission to be a man?"

3) The moment you reveal to personal stuff about yourself…

- I am not saying… don't say anything about yourself… but say some stuff… not a your life…


4) You are Buyer… Not A product

- If you are there with mindset she will change me … and what she tells me.. I AM GOING TO DO IT…
YOU TOTALLY

LOST HER
NO GIRL WANTS TO BE THE MAN IN THE FAMILY



Comedy: Life…?- It Sucks!?

By DeYtH Banger


How about go get go… to ruin the whole myths and debunk all the bullshit… Suicide is a disease not something which you commit… it's illness.. it happens when you are deeply depressed… it's constant…chronic pain…


AND LOOK FORWARD
LONG NAILS PORN
HANDJOB
HAIRJOB
BLOWJOB
BIG DICK
MILF
GILF
LONG TOE NAILS
FOOTJOB
FEETJOB
HIGH HEELS JOB
BLONDE GETS FACIAL
WOMAN WANKS A DICK
SEMEN ON FACE


And we go to facial when we want to talk about face and we never want to be rude and we go as semen on face… not sperm… it's definetly rude. We as society we are fragile humans are dead end creatures… depression happens because we as humans we are not ready for screen time… we are ready for socializing not islolating… When you see people who are anti… social… asocial those fuckers are inner all levels fucked up… they don't want it… but happens…

RULES?
FUCK 'EM!

One by one… each by each… your mom sucks… what's that?
Total level honesty and I am not as screw liable friends!

When dick is on… it's total all levels of flinch… I HOPE I GO AND START KILLING PEOPLE ON GRINDER IT'S GONNA BE TOTAL LOST ON THE JOKE BUT NOT AS GOOD AS A WOMAN TELLING ME AFTER SHOWING A MIDDLE FINGER ON HER FACE


PUT THIS IN YOUR ASS


I am against pretty girls… it fucms me over in whole all fucking new levels. GOD HATES ME… I AM ALL FULL ON.

ALL FULL PACKAGE… HE IS AGAINST ME SO DO I….. I AM READY YO DEBUNK YLTHIS SICKO FUCK…

I want one of those fancy disease… cancer… tumor… don't feeling pain… that's how god marks the special ones… the special humans. I have bern rejected from my mom… Let me finish what I mean… I mean… I have no more near experience as vaginal and near my father dick anf being inside it and then somehow dishusting awfully image of being a fetus flowing in my mom stomach… being in there…

IF NOW I GO AS FAR AS THAT
THERE IS WHOLE FUCKING LIST WITH DISORDER AND PSYCHOLOGICAL ILLNESS

Living in somebody stomach … as much as 9 much is some kinda screw up as those aliens movies in which… aliens come out of the stomach…


WHAT'S THE LONG LASTING PROBLEM OF SOCIETY?

IT CARES JUST TOO MUCH, CHILL THE FUCK UP!


If I go full on fucking my mom… and even going around my dick father as for the father thing… it's gay son… gay thing as for my mom thing milf… as for all for the all full on package it's… I HAVE NO FUCKING CLUE!

AT LEAST FEEL GREATFUL THAT I AM NOT THROWING GOD WITTY TAILS!

Guys who go and rape girls… they are total alpha fucks… the guy who is going and raping… he today is definetly going to have sex… probably now… probably after an hour… a minute… a day… who knows!?

I STUDY AND READ ABOUT THIS SHIT

He is definetly going to have sucess with eomen as general stand point… because women like tension… like obstacles and so far if you got drama and punishing women ….. AND HONESTLY ONE OF THE MOST CRAZY CLARITTY ANSWER I HAVE EVER GOTTEN IS WOMEN SECRETLY IMAGINE BEING RAPE…

THOSE LITTLE MINGLE FINKY TWIKS… WANNA BE FUCKING RAPE… AS BAD AS HELL!!

Bible Arguments 2

By DeYtH Banger


"So despite some biblical exhortations that child sacrifice was alien to the worship of Yahweh, a closer inspection shows instead that this practice was within the mainstream theology of the Yahweh cult. Only at a late stage in the history of Israelite religion was child sacrifice branded as counter to the will of Yahweh.

    Nearly all ancient cultures sacrificed human beings—especially virgins and children—to their gods to please them. This is utterly barbaric, conceived by a barbaric people who had no clue what an eternally good God could ever want them to do. In the New Testament Christians even interpreted the death of Jesus as God sacrificing his only begotten Son to atone for our sins."

- John W. Loftus

"Randal is rejecting the Bible in favor of his own moral intuitions here—ones I share. That’s what he’s doing. And if he can do this once, then why not just reject it all along with me? He has the gall to proclaim, despite the evidence, that God is “a maximally competent author.” But if this is true, why did his God communicate in such an incompetent manner that caused a number of children to be needlessly butchered."

- John W. Loftus

"Primarily we’ve learned that the gods are not leaning over a celestial balcony looking down on earth and smelling the smoke of burning flesh as it rises to them. Nor do they open the floodgates of heaven to send rain for our crops. The universe is bigger than this and the rain falls naturally. So there is no one “up there” we need to appease. And there is no reason to kill our children to make it rain either."

- John W. Loftus

"Can’t he say “no, don’t do that,” like any good parent? This is a lame excuse for a God. This practice is barbaric by Randal’s own standards, which is the point."

- John W. Loftus

"John’s Opening Statement

    There are several genocidal texts from the lips of Yahweh, the biblical God. You see it reflected in Joshua 6:16–25; Deuteronomy 2:4–34; 7:1–6; and

Numbers 31:7–18 (cf. Isa. 13:13–22; Ps. 137:7–9). In Deuteronomy 20:16–18 we read:

    But as for the towns of these peoples that the LORD [Yahweh] your God is giving you as an inheritance, you must not let anything that breathes remain alive. You shall annihilate them—the Hittites and the Amorites, the Canaanites and the Perizzites, the Hivites and the Jebusites—just as the LORD [Yahweh] your God has commanded, so that they may not teach you to do all the abhorrent things that they do for their gods, and you thus sin against the LORD [Yahweh] your God. (NRSV)

    In 1 Samuel 15:1–3 we read:

    And Samuel said to Saul, “The LORD [Yahweh] sent me to anoint you king over his people Israel; now therefore hearken to the words of the LORD [Yahweh]. Thus says the LORD of hosts [Yahweh of Armies], ‘I will punish what Amalek did to Israel in opposing

them on the way, when they came up out of Egypt. Now go and smite Amalek, and utterly destroy all that they have; do not spare them, but kill both man and woman, infant and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and ass.’” (RSV)

    The rationale for justifying genocide has fallen by the wayside among evangelicals since there can be no justifying it—not in an era that endorses the Geneva Convention, which condemns the killing of innocent noncombatants. Randal is one of these evangelicals, so I’ll let him make that case for me. All such attempts fail. They ultimately force apologists to embrace a cultural relativism."

- John W. Loftus

"By contrast, the God of the Bible exacerbated child exploitation with his so-called “satire” because it was written in an era when genocide was not morally questionable. Believers have likewise obeyed the Bible precisely because it’s considered divinely inspired. It was obvious to everyone that Swift was writing a satire, whereas this is not the case at all with the God of the Bible. Randal’s moral intuitions have merely caused him to once again reject the Bible."

- John W. Loftus

"The God explanation has suffered so many huge hits that it’s surprising anyone continues to tout it at all.

    Thomas Aquinas argued that God was the unmoved mover in a series of contemporaneous events stretching hierarchically up some sort of great chain of being. But such an argument is rendered bogus in light of the concept of inertia, which does away with the need to explain motion as requiring either an infinite regress of causes or an unmoved mover. And so it goes for all of the other cosmological and design arguments to the existence of God—something I won’t pursue further here."

- John W. Loftus

"As modern science advances, it creates an ever-increasing number of new mysteries that scientists are in the process of solving. So faith will probably always find a foothold in mystery. This is the reason why I must show Randal’s faith is impossible before he will ever consider it to be improbable, which is an unreasonable standard. My point is that science, not faith, solved the mysteries of the past, and it is science, not faith, that has opened up the number of new mysteries today. Faith by contrast has no method and solves no mysteries."

- John W. Loftus

"Faith by itself produces nothing and is dead without mysteries.

    As far as I can tell, even if there is a god of some kind, he may have only created what Edward Tryon and Stephen Hawking both describe as a “quantum wave fluctuation”[11] and then committed divine suicide afterwards, or died in order to create. Or instead, a god may exist who is guiding the universe ultimately toward an evil purpose but has maliciously chosen to present himself as benevolent to trick us. If such a trickster god exists, then all of the evidence leading Christians to conclude their good God exists was simply planted there to deceive us by that very same God. I can see no reasonable objection to these other god-hypotheses once we allow them into our equations."

- John W. Loftus

"So even if there is a God who created the whole shebang, then as far as I can tell there is no reason to believe this god is Randal’s God. Such an entity is therefore an unnecessary hypothesis. It actually gets in the way of solving the mysteries of existence, as history repeatedly shows."

- John W. Loftus

"Can we really imagine a being who never learned anything? Can we really imagine a being who cannot think, since doing so means a conclusion has not been reached yet? How did this nonmaterial agent create a material universe out of nothing unless there is some aspect that this agent shares with a material world? How did a timeless being create the universe in time, since the very decision to create it would be simultaneous with the act of creating it? The universe would therefore be an eternal one if he created it at all, and such a being would never be found timeless. Finally, why did he create anything at all, since he neither needs nor wants anything at all."

- John W. Loftus

"With Randal’s God explanation there is no reason to investigate why the universe exists, since he says science can’t do this. This is the standard theistic response to the unsolved mysteries of the past. Why keep betting on faith to solve them when it has solved nothing so far."

- John W. Loftus

Bible Arguments

By DeYtH Banger


"The delusional belief that what we do matters for all of eternity provides a false hope. Such a false hope falls under the Marxist critique that religion acts like a drug to numb us from the pain of injustice on earth through hope of a heaven in the afterlife. Having eyes on a heaven in the sky causes believers to be no earthly good. In fact, the hope of an afterlife devalues human life. Who really cares if people die when we go to war? The righteous will go to heaven. So let’s go to war. What does it matter if we abuse the environment? This earth is not our eternal home. What does it really matter that a tsunami wiped out a quarter of a million people? God will reward believers with eternal life. “The poor you will always have with you,” Jesus reportedly said (Matt. 26:11)."

- John W. Loftus


"Neither Sinatra’s boots nor rocks nor human beings were created by a deity for any purpose. Unlike boots and rocks though, we have evolved to be our own meaning makers. We were thrust into this world and must now make the best of this life. We cannot do otherwise Let’s talk about what we need to have a happy and fulfilling life. We need people. No one is an island. Social ostracism is painful, as is poverty, illness, or a life lived in prison. It’s doubtful any reasonable person prefers these things to having friends, wealth, food, health, and freedom. So in order to gain these benefits a person must have a kind and trustworthy character, earn his or her keep, stay healthy and fit, and obey the law. People who pursue risky behaviors or sick fantasies will eventually lose their freedom; so reasonable people don’t chase after those things.

    Since we cannot turn on and off what we value like a faucet, we must sometimes act contrary to our immediate self-interests for an overall life plan that includes friendship, love, and worth. Holistic happiness is its own reward. That is all the meaning we need in life."

- John W. Loftus


"Once locked inside the house of life we must get along if we want the benefits of a life worthy to be lived, and that means mutual cooperation. Those who refuse we ostracize. Those who choose to hurt others will eventually be caught and banished from society in jail."

- John W. Loftus

"There are other conceptions of gods with their own moralities. And how does this being communicate to us what is permitted? Isn’t it evident that the Christian God has not effectively done so, given the biblical record and the history of the church?
There is no evidence that a Christian God is needed for morality since many non-Christian cultures have done very well for themselves in their own time periods with no Christian influence at all, such as Greece during the Golden Age, the Roman Empire, China, and Japan. This is nothing but a parochial, narrow-minded, and uninformed claim. I think all a believer has to do is travel the globe to see this."

- John W. Loftus

"Morality evolves. It has done so from the very beginning. Morality is not even unique to human beings. We find precursors of it in the nonhuman species.

    But maybe I’ve missed the point?

    If this is supposed to be an argument for the existence of God, not even Richard Swinburne, one of the greatest living Christian apologists, thinks it works: “I cannot see any force in an argument to the existence of God from the existence of morality.”[3] If it doesn’t convince him, why should it convince me, or anyone else for that matter."

- John W. Loftus

"Does God create morality? If so, he can create any kind of morality at all. Then any acts—even horrific ones—could be morally obligatory simply because God commands them. Or must God instead derive morality from a higher source? If so, even God must obey it. Christian philosophers have all but abandoned the divine command theory, or at least modified it. All they can say is that God is what he is and that he does what he does. That’s it!"

- Johm W. Loftus


"‘Happy is the one who seizes your infants and dashes them against the rocks.’ Really? What do you mean? You want me to kill my children? Why them? Yes, I know they are unrighteous, lacking a care for godly things. That’s my fault as a mother. Why me? You want to test me just like you tested Abraham with Isaac? Are you sure? I just can’t do that. You want me to drown them in the bathtub? If you insist, Lord."

- John W. Loftus


"Contrary to Randal, if there is a God, everything can be permitted, for faith-based reasoning can justify any evil deed. In fact, religion is what turns otherwise good people into evil monsters because they think God told them what to do, either “audibly” or from something they read in the Bible."

- John W. Loftus


"John’s Opening Statement

    Child sacrifice was commanded of the Israelites by Yahweh, the biblical God. In Exodus 22:29–30 we read:

You shall not delay to offer from the fulness of your harvest and from the outflow of your presses. The first-born of your sons you shall give to me. You shall do likewise with your oxen and with your sheep: seven days it shall be with its dam; on the eighth day you shall give it to me. (RSV)

    The context of this passage concerns offerings and sacrifices, and it says God requires firstborn sons to be literally sacrificed to him. Later on we find Yahweh admitting he commanded this in Ezekiel 20:25–26, where he purportedly said:

    Moreover I gave them statutes that were not good and ordinances by which they could not have life; and I defiled them through their very gifts in making them offer by fire all their first-born, that I might horrify them; I did it that they might know that I am the LORD [Yahweh]. (RSV)."

- John W. Loftus


"The case of Micah 6:6–8 is an interesting one. In it child sacrifice is considered the greatest and highest form of sacrifice, for the prophet has a progression of three parts in pondering what will please Yahweh the most. Micah first considers sacrificing one-year-old calves; then he considers sacrificing thousands of rams; then he culminates in considering the highest offering he could give Yahweh: his firstborn son. His logic depends on child sacrifice being the greatest sacrifice of all—more than that of sacrificing the calves or rams—for the shocking conclusion of his ruminations is that even this greatest sacrifice is unacceptable to Yahweh without justice. For while all of these acts were required by Yahweh, they meant nothing without also doing acts of justice.

    Child sacrifice was only later considered evil after Josiah’s reforms and even more so after the Babylonian exile. Even the later rhetoric in Deuteronomy 12:29–31 and Jeremiah 7:31, 19:5, and 32:35 which condemns the practice all assumes that people thought it was acceptable to Yahweh. Otherwise why would these later authors find a need to condemn it? In other texts the practice was condemned primarily because it was offered to other deities (2 Kings 17:17; 23:10; 2 Chron. 28:3; 33:4–10; Ps. 106:38; Isa. 57:5–6; Ezek. 16:20–21; 20:26, 31; 23:37, 39)."

- John W. Loftus